revista presei

Revista presei internaționale pro-viață și pro-familie din 6 octombrie

Recently I saw a Facebook post where someone was speaking of pro-lifers calling a woman at a clinic a Jezebel and murderer.  LiveAction, 5 octombrie

An expectant mother lost her preborn child after an abortionist allegedly committed an abortion on her because he had the wrong medical chart and failed to confirm the patient’s identity. LiveAction, 5 octombrie

In a September 25th tweet, NARAL Pro-Choice America sought to celebrate the 50th anniversary of their founding in 1969 by sharing the timeline of the pro-abortion organization’s “milestones.” LiveaAction, 5 octombrie

Medical leaders representing more than 30,000 doctors said intentionally killing a baby in an abortion is never necessary to save a mother’s life. LifeNews, 4 octombrie

Last week, Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren took a slim lead in the race for the nomination to face Joe Biden. LifeNews, 3 octombrie

It’s hard to believe it’s been a year since the battle over Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court. His confirmation process was indisputably one of the most toxic, partisan times in Washington, DC. What were the takeaways from that episode? FoxNews, 6 octombrie

In an incredible display of human compassion, a young man whose brother was shot and killed forgave the cop who had been found guilty of his murder.  LifeNews, 3 octombrie

Today, Dr. Jose Frank Piña, 30, has a wife and a daughter in his native Dominican Republic. He is a medical missionary who shares medical advice every Saturday on television. FoxNews, 5 octombrie

Teenage girls may be more prone to depression if they take birth control pills, a new study suggests. FoxNews, 5 octombrie

police department in Texas has given a newborn boy the love he needs. FoxNews, 5 octombrie

Ai un comentariu despre acest articol? Adaugă-l

mai jos în caseta „Lasă un răspuns”

Ai o opinie despre un subiect de actualitate? Scrie-ne la

DISCLAIMER: condamnă instigarea la ură şi violenţă. Dar, după cum confirmă şi CEDO în cazul Handyside vs. UK (para 49), consideră că dezbaterea onestă şi libertatea de exprimare pe subiecte de interes public – printre care se numără şi avortul sau atracţia pentru persoane de acelaşi sex – trebuie să aibă loc în mod democratic, fără a fi cenzurate de ameninţarea că vor fi interpretate ca „discurs al urii”.

Lasă un răspuns

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicată. Câmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *

Articole relaționate

Back to top button